Friday, October 14, 2011

Short Essay on Angelology and Satanology


Angels and Demons, it is not just a book title or a Hollywood movie; these topics are a must for the Christian to understand and discuss. At the root of this discussion exists the problem of evil and more specifically whether or not God is the author of such evils. For if God created Satan, that fallen angel of evil, it’s possible he created evil, however Scripture attests to something quite different (Jas. 1:13; 1 Cor. 14:33).
            From this debate of evil the question of dualism is raised. Ethical dualism is the doctrine that avows the existence of two reciprocated beings, one the provenance of all-good and the other an equal provenance of all-evil.[1] Though God and Satan might seem to fit this synopsis the two beings are certainly not equal in attributes. God created all things including the angels (Gen. 1:1), which is a display of his awesome power. He is the everlasting, eternal being (1 Tim. 1:17) to which none can be the creator. Satan himself has been described as one disguised as an angel of light (2 Cor. 11:14). If Satan is an angel then no matter his efforts creation is subject to the creator. Though his power is second only to God (Ezek. 28:12-17) he is subject to God’s will for the use of his power (Job 1:12).[2]
            The downfall of Satan and his ultimate demise has been well documented in Scripture. This once high angel called the morning star (Isa. 14:12); the symbol of perfection that inhabited the Garden of Eden (Ezek. 28:12-13) will ultimately be judged and condemned to the fiery pit prepared for him and his fallen angels (Rev. 20:10).  Though he still roams the earth today seeking those whom to devour (1 Pet. 5:8), Satan has already been judged to perish which explains the fervor at which he pursues his mission to disrupt the work of God.
            Though Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14 appear to be speaking directly about Satan himself some have offered their defeaters to the notion that this speaks explicitly of that serpent of old. The naysayers claim that these passages are specifically addressing the king of Tyre and Babylon not Satan. [3] Though it is true these verses appear to speak about these earthly kings the attributes such as son of the dawn (Isa. 14:12), the model of perfection (Ezek. 28:12), anointed guardian cherub (Ezek. 28:14), and so on, do not speak of a mortal man. These attributes must be applied to a heavenly host, and Satan fits that description as the fallen one quite agreeably.
            From Satan’s own desire to be like the most high (Isa. 14:13-14) his ultimate nature can be discovered. Satan is a liar (Jn. 8:44), sinner from inception (1 Jn. 3:8) and as such God cannot be accredited with his fall. If God was to intervene and stop Satan from his evil plans in the beginning this would have been a contradiction of God-given free will.[4] Viewing God’s restraint in this manner leads one to conclude God could not be the author of evil though he was the creator of Satan (Jas. 1:13).
            A reading of the first chapter of the book of Job speaks volumes to the power and position Satan has in reference to God. Satan is first seen as presenting himself before God (Job 1:6) a sign of submission to God. He is also viewed as being restricted to harm only Job’s circumstances and not Job himself (Job 1:12) a denial of Satan’s omnipotence. Next God asks Satan if he has considered Job as a righteous man (Job 1:8) alluding to the fact that Satan’s knowledge is not ultimate. God as the uncreated one (Col. 1:15-17) cannot have an end yet Satan’s obliteration has been predicted since the beginning (Gen 3:15; Rev 20:10). He is not eternal nor is Satan equal on any level with the one he seeks to overthrow.
            Though it has been utilized as a phrase for copping out, “the devil made me do it” couldn’t be farther from the truth. Satan certainly has the power to tempt as is evidenced by his discourse with Christ (Lk. 4:1-13), yet he cannot force one to do something much in the same way God cannot force someone to accept him. Both examples would clearly violate the function of free will. It is true that demonic activity will increase in the latter days and many will be seduced to follow them (1 Tim. 4:1)[5] however, it does not follow that seduction is the same as extortion. You have the power to resist the devil and he will turn from his pursuit (Jas. 4:7) but if you yield to temptation you alone are responsible for your fall, not some external cause.


[1]             H.B. Kuhn, “Dualism,” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 357.            
[2]             M.F. Unger, “Satan,” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 1054.
[3]             M.F. Unger, “Satan,” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 1054.
[4]             Elmer Towns, Theology for Today (Mason: Thomson Custom Solutions Center, 2001), 367.
[5]             S.E. McClelland, “Demon, Demonization,” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 332.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Short Essay on Pneumatology


The church has exercised spiritual gifts since its inception and there are allusions to these movements in the Old Testament, particularly in the gift of prophecy (Mic. 3:8; Ezek. 2:2).  However the application and subsequent validity of the various gifts have caused a chasm in the body of Christ that has given way to denominational discrepancy.
            Spiritual gifts can be categorized as gifts from God equipping the Christian to perform their duty to the body of Christ and those outside the body.[1] Some of these gifts include healing (1 Cor. 12:9), apostleship (1 Cor. 12:28), teaching (1 Cor. 12:28-29), and etc. Many of the gifts were to focus on administering aid, discernment or edification to the body of Christ while some gifts, namely the gift of interpretation of tongues, help to clarify and understand other gifts.
            There is a difference between the “fruits of the Spirit” and “spiritual gifts.” The fruits of the Spirit are love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self- control (Gal. 5:22-23) all of which show the level of maturity of a believer. Faithfulness for example takes a certain amount of perseverance and trust in the locus of your faith and this is not accomplished by a rudimentary devotion. Spiritual gifts in contrast do not all require a level of maturity in Christ. Speaking in tongues came upon new believers such as the gentiles with Cornelius (Acts 10:44-45) or the John’s disciples in Ephesus (Acts 19:6).
            The gift of Speaking in tongues has been the subject of much hysteria, confusion and overemphasis in recent times. Moreover the passages that contain information on this gift should be examined to better interpret its application and usefulness.[2] Glossolalia, has two main functions, it’s useful as an initiation meant to divinely affirm a new union in the church (1 Cor. 12:4-11) and it was also a special gift endowed on specifically chosen individuals (Rom. 12:6).[3] As Paul correctly observes the one who speaks in tongues merely enlightens himself, and it would be better if the person prophesied instead (1 Cor. 14:4-5). Tongues can be useful with proper interpretation (1 Cor. 14:13) however; other gifts are more profitable in edifying the church.
            Baptism of the Holy Spirit is among the most distinguished blessing granted from the Gospel by the indwelling of the Spirit.[4] This concept was first mentioned in the New Testament; John was speaking of the one to come who would baptize “with the Holy Spirit and with Fire” (Matt. 3:11). This baptism could only take place on those who are prepared to fully submit themselves to God. Paul insightfully states that without the Spirit no one can call Jesus Lord (1 Cor. 12:3) and this gives credence to the notion that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is for those fully surrendered to Christ. It should be noted this experience is not a second baptism or blessing, though it may appear this way in Scripture at times (Acts 19:6), however, this instance reflected those who did not follow the correct baptismal formula (Matt. 28:19).
            Some elect to posture the notion that speaking in tongues is a necessary sign of baptism in the Holy Spirit. After examining Scripture this view is shown to be fallacious. Though there are instances when new believers received this gift after being baptized (Acts 8:14-19; 10:44-46; 19:6), there are other instances where this does not follow (Acts 4:31; 8:17; 9:17-18). Moreover, historical passages are not to be used to institute dogma unless they are endorsed by teaching material.[5] While not denying the gift of speaking in tongues, it does not follow that this gift is an absolute affirmation of spirit baptism. In reviewing the different spiritual gifts Paul points that some are given certain gifts while some are given other gifts (1 Cor. 12:7-10). Therefore if some are not given the gift of tongues this does not disqualify their spirit baptism.
            Though there remain other gifts more desirable (1 Cor. 14:5) the gift of speaking in tongues still has validity today. Some have utilized 1 Corinthians 13:8-10 specifically the word “perfect” in verse 10 to substantiate their claim that gifts like tongues, along with others are no longer useful. However, this view goes too far. Perfect, teleios, describes complete labor or growth, and is used in other places to describe things in their wholeness (Matt. 5:48; Jas. 1:17). The description of “perfect” was not the condition of the church then nor is it a reflection of it now. The body of Christ is divided as is evidenced by our many denominations, yet when the time comes for Christ’s return and subsequent gathering us to Him, we will then be teleios (1 Cor. 13:12). Until then, gifts such as tongues should not be dismissed as antiquated.

Bibliography
Osborne, G.R. “Tongues, Speaking In.” In Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd ed., 1206-09. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001.

Thomson, J.G.S.S., and W.A. Elwell. “Spiritual Gifts.” In Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd ed., 1135-38. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001.

White, R.E.O. “Baptism of the Spirit.” In Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd ed., 137-38. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001.


[1]             J.G.S.S. Thomson and W.A. Elwell, “Spiritual Gifts.” in Evangelical Dictionary of                        Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 1135.
           
[2]             G.R. Osborne, “Tongues, Speaking In.” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed.                        Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 1209.

[3]             Ibid, 1206.

[4]             R.E.O. White, “Baptism of the Spirit.” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2nd Ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001), 137.
[5]             Osborne, 1207.